Sunday, August 28, 2016

Re: Iannello and Godfrey, “Possible Flight Path...”

Iannello and Godfrey

Very interesting. The narrative checks a lot of boxes. Perhaps all of the boxes.

The points in the SIO on ZS's flight simulator are certainly a compelling reason to believe that a flight was simulated in that direction. Again, no hint of motive is apparently provided by this new information. I say apparently because it takes a little more thought, albeit speculative thought, to make sense of it all.

Let's start with the Malay response to the diversion in the first hour or two after the turn West near IGARI. The response was below minimal standards. One could even describe it as pathetic. Even the ICAO was critical of it, and that is highly unusual for that organization(1). Many people wondered why the response was not a “dialing until your fingers bled” effort. A simple explanation is that the status (not the exact location) of the aircraft was known. Third parties in KL were attempting to negotiate concessions from the Malay leadership in KL, with MH370 as the lever. The exact nature of those concessions cannot be known, but there is certainly a large menu of options.

So ZS flew West from IGARI to play a waiting game to the North and West of the Malay Peninsula – waiting for word of success so that he could land the plane - Banda Aceh and Car Nicobar being logical choices. That word never came, and the “negotiation failed” response was to fly South and destroy the aircraft in the SIO. While that action may seem extreme, it was the only possible response. You cannot retreat from a situation like that without carrying out the stated threat. Your chance of a successful future negotiation is highly dependent on the other party understanding that your ultimatums must be regarded very seriously.

So with the “negotiation failed” result, ZS selected McMurdo Station as an AP destination, and resigned himself to his fate. His ambition of becoming a national hero was dashed, and he had to pay the price he knew full well was a possible outcome of this bold plan. So why practice the route on his simulator? Surely a pilot of his skill could execute that route without practice. The simple and obvious answer was to indulge curiosity. ZS wanted to know where the plane would run out of fuel, and observe his final resting place on the planet.

The simulated route did not include the turn near IGARI. The simulation was most likely done with the assumption that the diversion would be performed on a route to Europe. Scheduling and other constraints required a diversion from the Beijing route. A European route would have been preferred, since the diversion would not be noticed until the plane had flown well past the Malay Peninsula.

I think the implication in the “discussion” section of the latest IG narrative is excellent. A logical place to look for the aircraft is where a flight path to McMurdo crosses the Inmarsat 7th BTO arc. While the precise location of the FMT in the actual route flown is a bit “fuzzy”, the geometry reduces the spread in the 7th arc crossing locations. Also the latitude of the crossing derived in the IG narrative, ~27S, is far more consistent with the debris finds (and lack of finds) than is ~38S.